Legal Opinion

County of Oswego v. Maroney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 7, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously reversed on the law and in the exercise of discretion with costs and application granted in accordance with the following Memorandum: EDPL 701 provides that the court may, in its discretion, grant an additional allowance for costs, disbursements and expenses where the *1032award is substantially in excess of "the condemnor’s proof’ and when deemed necessary by the court for the condemnee to achieve just and adequate compensation. The term "condemnor’s proof’ refers to the condemnor’s initial offer (First Bank & Trust Co. v State of New York, 184 AD2d 1034; Matter of New York…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the New York Transit AuhorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. First Bank & Trust Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Scuderi v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Acquisition of Real Property by the Village of Johnson CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. National Fuel Gas Supply Corp. v. Cunningham Natural Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Apton v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API