Legal Opinion

Pavel v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 16, 1994No. 9112-07856; CA A78282PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant vehicle manufacturer in this action under ORS 646.315 et seq (the statute). We affirm.

In 1990, plaintiffs purchased a motor home manufactured by defendant. By early May of the following year, the vehicle had spent approximately 100 days in various repair shops for a variety of necessary repairs and corrective measures. Plaintiffs’ attorney wrote defendant and apprised it of that fact, among others. At no time, however, did plaintiffs provide defendant with advance notice of the need to correct any specific defect or condition. Defendant,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southwood Homeowners Ass'n v. City Council of PhilomathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Craven v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Liles v. Damon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API