Legal Opinion

Daniels v. Rapco Foam, Inc.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1988No. 84CA1132PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRISWELL, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Rapco Foam, Inc. (Rapco), and Scientific Applications, Incorporated (Scientific). We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Rapco manufactured foam insulation containing formaldehyde. Scientific was its local distributor. A third defendant, Cellular Product Services, Inc. (Cellular), installed the product in plaintiffs’ home. None of the defendants gave any warning to plaintiffs of the possible side effects that plaintiffs claimed the release of formaldehyde gas into the home environment could…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Colorado Aviation, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Conrad v. ImataniColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. BowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. Wood v. RowlandColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. C.K.A. v. M.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J.P. v. District Court in & for the 2nd Judicial District of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Overland Development Co. v. Marston Slopes Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Four Strong Winds, Inc. v. LyngholmColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Fenton v. Fibreboard Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Freedman v. Kaiser Foundation Health PlanColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API