Legal Opinion

United States v. Millman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1986No. 84-474 Misc. (JBW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

WEINSTEIN, Chief Judge:

Following a full hearing before United States Magistrate A. Simon Chrein, on the record before the Magistrate and oral argument, the “Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate” set out below is adopted by the court.

The petitioner’s request to enforce the summons is granted.

The respondent’s request for further discovery is denied.

So ordered.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

A. SIMON CHREIN, United States Magistrate.

This is an action to enforce petitioner’s tax subpoena pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7602(b) and § 7604(a) (1982).

FACTS

In or about…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  5. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States of America and Peter P. Calarco, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Daniel Millman, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API