Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Muse

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

FROM BEDFORD. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Bedford County— Walter S. Bearden, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

The complainant in this case is a sister of the defendant. In 1876 she sold to her brother her interest in a tract of land in Bedford county for $1,415 taking his note for the purchase money, and secured the payment of the same by a deed of trust executed at that time. The note was not paid, and the deed of trust was not foreclosed, but in April, 1895, the defendant executed to his sister a note in the following words and figures:

“One day after date I promise to pay H. A. Muse $1,415. This is a renewal of a former note for land which is secured by mortgage which is still in force this April…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McElwee v. McElweeTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bank v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Runnells v. JacobsTennessee Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shanks v. PhillipsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. WallTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  3. First National Bank of Sparta v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  4. Osborne v. McCormackTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Hall v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API