Legal Opinion
Rocco v. Rocco
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly determined, without conducting a hearing, that his acknowledged failure to comply with certain provisions of the September 21, 2010, pendente lite order was willful, and that an adjudication of contempt was warranted (see Domestic Relations Law § 245; Lopez v Ajose, 33 AD3d 976 [2006]; York v York, 250 AD2d 838 [1998]; Turk v Turk, 226 AD2d 448 [1996]; Farkas v Farkas, 209 AD2d 316 [1994]). The plaintiffs allegation that he was unable to meet his pendente lite obligations because of his reduced income was unsubstantiated and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Farkas v. FarkasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Rosenblitt v. RosenblittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Lopez v. AjoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- York v. YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ovsanikow v. OvsanikowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlin v. CarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Basile v. WiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Basile v. WiggsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Carlin v. CarlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013