Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

YOUNG, MARTIN v. the State of Texas

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 2026No. PD-0526-25Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0526-25 THE STATE OF TEXAS v. MARTIN YOUNG, Appellee ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS GUADALUPE COUNTY SCHENCK, P.J., filed a concurring and dissenting opinion in which WALKER, J., joined. CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION I join the opinion of the Court in holding that the court of appeals erred by concluding the State forfeited its consensual-encounter argument on appeal. But YOUNG DISSENT–2 the Court’s decision to remand to the court of appeals, in my view, serves only to further delay justice by…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. State v. Garcia-CantuCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  5. State v. CastleberryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API