Heyward v. Ramsey
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
This is a suit upon an account stated. In Ward v. Stewart, 103 Ga. 260 (3), 262 (29 S. E. 872), it was held that “an account stated is an agreement between persons who have had previous transactions, fixing the amount due in respect of such transactions, and promising payment.” See also, to the same effect, Borders v. Gay, 6 Ga. App. 735 (65 S. E. 788); Shores-Mueller Co. v. Bell, 21 Ga. App. 195 (1) (94 S. E. 83); Moore v. Hendrix, 144 Ga. 646 (1a) (87 S. E. 915). Thus, it is apparent that the necessary elements of an “account stated” are previous transactions, the fixing of an amount due in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Moore v. Hendrix & HodgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Ward v. Stewart & WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Borders v. GayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Shores-Mueller Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawson v. Dixie Feed & Seed Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Davies v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Walker v. Industrial Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Consolidated Van & Storage Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1960