George Mato Dotel v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for first-degree murder and four other related counts. He argues the trial court erred in: (1) denying his motion to suppress, (2) instructing the jury outside the presence of the defendant and his lawyer, (3) denying his request for a special independent act instruction, and (4) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. The State cross-appeals and argues the court erred in: (1) reducing the armed robbery conviction to a robbery conviction, and instructing the jury on duress and independent act defenses. We find no merit in the issues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kasischke v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Backus v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Freeny v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Otis Woodberry v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Armstrong v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
- Dial v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (St. Johns County)District Court, M.D. Florida · 2023
- Dominique J. Fudge v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
- Riley v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2019