Legal Opinion
PINNACLE HOLDING v. Biologics, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 23, 1994No. 93-03852PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
643 So.2d 642 (1994)
PINNACLE HOLDING, INC., Appellant,
v.
BIOLOGICS, INC., Appellee.
No. 93-03852.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
September 23, 1994.
John S. Colley, III, Columbia, TN, for appellant.
V. James Dickson and David J. Sockol, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Pinnacle Holding, Inc. seeks review of a summary final judgment based on the doctrine of novation. Because we conclude that the cancellation of the promissory note does not alter the efficacy of the letter agreement's repurchase provision and as we hold that the disputed element of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Evans v. BorkowskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Young v. Morris Realty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Electro-Protective Corp. v. Creative Jewelry By Kempf, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Thompson v. Jared Kane Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- De Las Cuevas v. National Enterprises, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Excess Risk Underwriters, Inc. v. Lafayette Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
- Solnes v. Wallis & Wallis, P.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.