Legal Opinion

In re Finkelstein

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Original proceeding. Application for writ of Ikibeas corpus and certiorari in aid thereof to review proceedings of district court, resulting in the commitment of relator for contempt in refusing to obey an order for the payment of alimony.

1Opinion of the CourtHarwood, J.

In this proceeding, which comprises a writ of habeas corpus addressed to the sheriff of Lewis and Clarke county, together with a writ of certiorari addressed to the district court within and for said county, relator seeks a review of certain proceedings, and discharge from imprisonment imposed upon him by order of said court.

It appears that in an action for divorce and alimony instituted against relator by Eva Finkelstein, his alleged wife, such proceedings were had as resulted in an order of the district court requiring relator to pay fifty dollars for employment of counsel on behalf of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. In re MacKnightMontana Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Bordeaux v. BordeauxMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State Ex Rel. Lay v. District Court, Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State ex rel. King v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Hiss v. HissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API