Legal Opinion

Stiffler's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1922No. Appeal, No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

1. We agree with the construction placed by the court below upon rule No. 40 of its rules of court. It is, in terms, restricted to cases where the answer filed by the garnishee denies that he has assets in his hands liable to the attachment. The answer filed by appellants, as executors of Peter Stiffler, deceased, admitted that they had moneys in their hands belonging to said estate, and payable upon the settlement of the estate to the creditors of Peter Stiffler, or to his heirs, of whom the defendant in the judgment, A. H. Stiffler, was one; but averred that until the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bouslough v. BousloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  2. Hemphill v. YerkesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Neely v. GranthamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  4. Lorenz's Administrators v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1861
  5. Tams v. WardleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1843

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erie Mantel & Tile Co. v. Carr, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API