Legal Opinion

International Agricultural Corp. v. Pearce

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1940No. 4665PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Subpoenas duces tecum were served upon the appellant fertilizer companies commanding them to appear in the District Court and to produce a large mass of listed documents, books and papers which the attorneys of the United States intended to present to a grand jury summoned to inquire into complaints of alleged violations of the federal anti-trust laws by persons and corporations engaged in the fertilizer industry. The appellants moved the court to quash and vacate the subpoenas on the ground that they constituted an unlawful and unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. In Re Manufacturers Trading Corp. Kiersted v. Hadden (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  3. Meiselman v. Paramount Film Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
  4. National Nut Co. v. Kelling Nut Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  5. United States v. Grand Jury, and Henry M. Huffman, President, H & M Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API