Legal Opinion
Lindsey v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2006No. 99-CF-1295, 99-CF-1670, 03-CO-1283 and 03-CO-1286PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
The appellants, Gregory Lindsey and Marcus Gayles, both challenge their convictions of first-degree murder while armed, possession of a firearm during a crime of violence (PFCOV) and carrying a pistol without a license (CPWL) following a jury trial. Appellant Lindsey claims that his conviction should be reversed because the trial court denied his motion to suppress his confession. Appellant Gayles challenges his convictions based on the trial court’s denial of his motion to sever, the denial of his motion for a mistrial based on the government’s belated discovery…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Herrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Zanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Green v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. LENINNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.