Legal Opinion

Martin v. Schweiker

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 23, 1982No. C-81-0295 SWPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR REMAND AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SPENCER WILLIAMS, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), § 205(g) of the Social Security Act as amended, to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying his application for Supplemental Security Income benefits. Both parties have filed motions for summary judgment. Having carefully considered the arguments presented, this court concludes that the Secretary’s decision…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Donald M. Rhinehart v. Robert H. Rinch, Etc. (Wilbur J. Cohen, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Mack Hall, Sr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  4. William D. Cox v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. Ann E. Waters v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API