Legal Opinion
Norway National Bank v. Oates
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 12, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POMEROY, Justice.
By appropriate pleadings, we are asked, on report, pursuant to Rule 72(a) M.R. Civ.P. to construe the last Will and Testament (with two codicils thereto) of the late Emma L. Chapman.
This litigation originated in 1954 with the filing of a Bill in Equity requesting the construction of both the Will of William R. Chapman and that of Emma L. Chapman, with the codicils thereto; each of said Wills and codicils have been duly admitted to Probate.
On November 14, 1944, after providing for specific legacies, Emma L. Chapman bequeathed and devised the remainder of her estate to trustees…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of the United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Bradbury v. JacksonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- Thaxter v. FrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- In re Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of the United States Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Loggie v. ChandlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- National Newark & Essex Bank v. HartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- In Re Estate of TjadenNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Vickery v. GarretsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Mooney v. Northeast Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977