In re Baldwin
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
The State Bar charged B. Harris Baldwin with violating Standards 44 (abandonment or wilful disregard of a matter entrusted to him to the client’s detriment) and 68 (failure to respond to disciplinary proceedings in accordance with State Disciplinary Board rules) arising out of his representation of John B, Curry in various business matters. Baldwin failed to respond as required to the State Bar’s Investigative Panel, but filed a response to the State Board’s formal complaint against him. Following discovery, during which Baldwin presented his defenses to the charges against him, the State Bar…
2Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of Wallace W. Rogers, Jr.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1993