Legal Opinion

Dickson & Tweeddale v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 10, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Harlan, C. J.).

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This is a suit on the following promissory note of the appellants in favor of the appellee, which was filed with the declaration in the Court below:

“5,000.00. Jan. 5, 1908.
“Four mouths after date, we promise to pay to the order of Vm. E. Fowler, Five Thousand Dollars, at The First Rat. Bank of Baltimore, Md.
“Value received with 6% interest.
“Dickson & TweeddaeeT

In addition to the general issue plea, the defendants filed special pleas in which they charged, first, that the note “was procured by the fraud of the plaintiff,” and, secondly, that the note “was procured by the fraudulent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Linz v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  2. Gotwalt v. NealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Dunnill v. BloombergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Dunstan v. Bethlehem Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Alexander v. TingleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API