Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Compton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 17, 1996No. 19830Published

1Opinion of the Court

914 S.W.2d 378 (1996)

Joe Douglas COPELAND and Tracy Lynn Copeland, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

John COMPTON, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 19830.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division Two.

January 17, 1996.

Andy B. Hodges, Springfield, for plaintiffs-appellants.

June Clark, Carmichael, Gardner & Clark, Springfield, for defendant-respondent.

SHRUM, Chief Judge.

Joe and Tracy Copeland (Plaintiffs)[1] appeal from an adverse judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in their damage suit against Amy Nelson[2] (Defendant) for her alleged negligent operation of an automobile.

In their first two…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Crow; Concurrence · Crow.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of WashingtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Campbell v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  4. Bakelite Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Boone v. RichardsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API