Legal Opinion

City of Roman Forest v. Stockman

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 29, 2004No. 09-03-408 CVPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.

This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of a plea to the jurisdiction. See Tex. Crv. PRac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8) (Vernon Supp.2004). Gary Michael Stockman sued the City of Roman Forest for wrongful termination under the *808Whistleblower Act, for breach of contract, and for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The City says the trial court lacks jurisdiction because the City is immune from suit.

The case arises out of Stockman’s work for the City while he was a municipal court judge. A municipal court judge’s term of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission v. IT-DavyTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Federal Sign v. Texas Southern UniversityTexas Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Montgomery County Hospital District v. Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  2. Christopher L. Gay and Steven L. Carroll v. the City of Wichita Falls, Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  3. Medical Arts Hospital v. Robison, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
  4. Tomball Hospital Authority v. Harris County Hospital District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
  5. Jefferson County v. StinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API