Legal Opinion

Helms v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

William Helms (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) that affirmed the referee’s denial of benefits under Section 301(c) of the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. § 411. We affirm.

Claimant worked as a maintenance mechanic for United States Gypsum Company (Employer). On June 27, 1985, Claimant engaged in an altercation with George Simpson (Simpson). As a result of this fight, Employer discharged Claimant and Simpson.

On July 15, 1985, Claimant filed a petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cleland Simpson Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. General Electric Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Wills Eye Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Kandra v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bachman Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. JBS USA Holdings, Inc. v. WCAB (Vazquez)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API