Legal Opinion

Gill v. Minter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1950No. 12147PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORVELL, Justice.

This is a guest statute case, Article 6701b, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.Stats., which terminated in an instructed verdict for defendants. Appellant concedes that there is no evidence of liability against Merton Minter Sr., hut contends that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to appellant, is sufficient to show gross negligence on the part of the appellee Merton Minter Jr. The descriptive words of the statute relating to negligence have the same meaning as the term “gross negligence.” Bowman v. Puckett, 144 Tex. 125, 188 S.W.2d 571. In Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ShufordTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. I. & G. N. R. R. Co. v. CockeTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Bowman v. PuckettTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Southern Cotton Press & Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cone v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Webb v. KarstenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Hanks v. LaQueyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  4. Mildred Wooley, a Widow, Individually and as Guardian of Samuel Albert Wooley and Mary Jane Wooley v. Southwestern Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  5. Teston v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API