Jamison v. Shepard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On appeal. The factual situation out of which this appeal arose occurred during trial involving alleged negligence of the defendant resulting in consequential damages to the plaintiffs. By Chapter 424 P.L. 1965, now 14 M.R.S.A. § 156, the doctrine of comparative negligence was added to our statute. This statute abrogated our law of contributory negligence, which prevented recovery by a plaintiff in any degree negligent, and provided that in cases of fault on both plaintiff and defendant, such claims should not be defeated by reasons of the fault of the persons suffering the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Dubinsky Bros., Inc. v. Industrial Commission of Missouri Ex Rel. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Pierro v. PierroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Riley v. NaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cyr v. MichaudSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Sevigny v. Home Builders Ass'n of Maine, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- McNicholas v. York Beach Village Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Churchill v. S. A. D. 49 Teachers Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- State v. DrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.