Legal Opinion

Application of Joseph D. Howard and William M. Brobeck

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 16, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7953PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals, adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the action of the examiner in rejecting claims 2 and 3 of an application1 for a method for handling materials. The grounds upon which the rejections were predicated are that the claims fail to define patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. §§ 100 and 101 since they are drawn to a method of doing business, and that the method defined in the claims is old, being the same as that commonly used in connection with catalog sales. Apparatus claims 7 and 11 to 19 were allowed. There…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Street Bank & Trust Co. v. Signature Financial Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. In Re Burt F. RaynesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  3. In re PardoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  4. In re KuhleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  5. Application of Joseph D. Howard and William M. BrobeckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API