Legal Opinion

People v. Mills

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 19, 1996No. 96SA235Published

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. The parties agreed in the conditional admission to the imposition of a suspension from the practice of law within the range of thirty to sixty days. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission; however, the panel was not unanimous as to its recommendation that the respondent be suspended for thirty days. We accept the conditional admission but conclude that suspension for sixty days is warranted.

I

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. MillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API