Mote v. Oryx Energy Co.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT WEBSTER’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SCHELL, Chief Judge.
Before the court is Defendant Dan Webster’s Partial Motion to Dismiss filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Webster has moved to dismiss Plaintiffs claim brought under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act (“DTPA”) on the ground that Plaintiff is not a “consumer” and, therefore, not entitled to recover under the DTPA.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The motion was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Benito RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Birchfield v. Texarkana Memorial HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Flenniken v. Longview Bank and Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Tex. v. American Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Oryx Energy Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1997