Legal Opinion

Miller v. Keeling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 12, 1959No. 41,504PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

The question here involves the validity of that provision of our statute (G. S. 1949, 60-3495) which precludes garnishment of a portion of the earnings of a judgment debtor where the creditor sells, assigns, sends or delivers the account to a collecting agency for collection.

The trial court held the provision in question to be unconstitutional and void.

Defendant judgment debtor has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute.

Defendant was indebted to the Nu-Tone Products Co. on an open account. The company sold and assigned the account to plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dowd v. HeusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. State Ex Rel. Marshall v. Consumers Warehouse Market, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  3. In re IrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Mallory v. BerrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. In re Irish for a Writ of Habeas CorpusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lampe v. Iola Bank & Trust (In Re Lampe)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  2. Nohinek v. LogsdonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Wagner v. MahaffeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Coward v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  5. State v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API