Legal Opinion

Gardner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 12, 2004No. 02-5523Published

1Opinion of the Court

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 2 In re Gardner No. 02-5523 ELECTRONIC CITATION:

2004 FED App. 0077P (6th Cir.)

File Name: 04a0077p.06 _________________ COUNSEL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ARGUED: David M. Cantor, SEILLER & HANDMAKER, FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Marion E.M. Erickson, _________________ UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David M. In re: GARY LOUIS GARDNER , X Cantor, C. Shawn Fox, SEILLER & HANDMAKER, Debtor. - Louisville, Kentucky, for Appellant. Marion E.M.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. In Re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re: M.J. Waterman & Associates, Inc., Debtor. Duane H. Barlow v. M.J. Waterman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  5. In Re: Henry Fegeley Annmarie Fegeley, Debtors. United States of America v. Henry Fegeley Annmarie Fegeley, Henry FegeleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API