Legal Opinion

Seabrook Village v. Murphy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 21, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Petitioner John Murphy appeals from the final decision of the New Jersey Department of Community Affairs (DCA), Bureau of *322Homeowner Protection. In its decision, the DCA determined that Seabrook Village was legally entitled to cancel its Residence and Care Agreement with petitioner and discharge him from its facility for his (1) refusal to pay monthly service fees and (2) failure to execute a release of the Living Unit that he previously occupied.

This appeal requires us to answer two legal questions, namely: (1) whether the procedures…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Cardona v. Eden Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  3. Sacks Realty Co., Inc. v. ShoreNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Starns v. American Baptist Estates of Red BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API