Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1989No. 12644PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HAYASHI, J.

Defendant-Appellant Steven Roger Austin (Austin) appeals his conviction for the first-degree promotion of the dangerous drug cocaine plus complicity pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) *301§§ 712— 1241(1 )(b)(ii)(B) (1985) and 702-222(l)(b) (1985).1 At the jury trial over the defense objections, Plaintiff-Appellee State of Hawaii (State) had introduced evidence about the police drug sting “Operation Rabbit” to show the involvement with illegal substances of the prosecution witnesses who had testified about Austin’s extensive drug trafficking. But Austin,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. FoxHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. EstradaHawaii Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. IaukeaHawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State v. ApaoHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HolbronHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. CordeiroHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. BehrendtHawaii Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. StegerHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. State v. JosephHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API