Chase v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford county: ■ Of October and November Term 1881, No. 144. ' Debt, by Sarah A. Chase, survivor of Edward II. Chase, to the use of Watson and Pierce against Asher S. Hubbard and Mary E. Hubbard, Ms wife, upon a joint and several bond for §4,000 given by defendants to plaiutiff Sarah A. Chase and Edward II. Chase, deceased.
Read the full summary
Error to the Court of Common Pleas of Crawford county: ■ Of October and November Term 1881, No. 144. ' Debt, by Sarah A. Chase, survivor of Edward II. Chase, to the use of Watson and Pierce against Asher S. Hubbard and Mary E. Hubbard, Ms wife, upon a joint and several bond for §4,000 given by defendants to plaiutiff Sarah A. Chase and Edward II. Chase, deceased. Judgment was entered upon this bond by virtue of the warrant of attorney thereto annexed, on November 19th 1877 in the sum of $1,054.94, that being the amount alleged to be due and unpaid thereon. Subsequently, on application of…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gordon
On' February 6th 1871, Edward H. Chase and Sarah A. Chase sold and conveyed a lot of ground in the city of Titus-ville to the defendants, Asher S. Hubbard and Mary E., his wife, for the sum of $4,000 — $1,000 of which were paid in hand on the delivery of the deed, and the balance was secured by a judgment bond and mortgage. On November 19th 1877 judgment was entered on this bond in the sum of $1,054.94, that being the amount alleged to be then due and unpaid. On the judgment thus entered execution was issued to September term, 1879, and afterwards, on application of the defendants, the court…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NollySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Ryon's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Western Bank Note & Engraving Co. v. SlentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911