Legal Opinion

Laing v. Township of Forest

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. Docket No. 60PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Assumpsit by Paul L. Laing against the township of Forest for taxes paid under protest. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

A number of persons owning property taxable in the township of Forest, in the county of Genesee, in this State, whose names and descriptions of whose property appeared upon the assessment and tax rolls of that township for the year 1903, and against whom upon said rolls various taxes were laid, paid the taxes under written protests. Each specified substantially the same grounds of protest.

Section 53 of the tax law, being section 3876 of the Compiled Laws of 1897, as amended hy Act No. 130 of the Public Acts of 1901, reads, so far as it is necessary to consider the same, as follows:

‘c Any…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coit v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. First National Bank v. WatkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Louden v. SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Dayton v. FargoMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Michigan Savings Bank v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Commissioner of Insurance v. American Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Daimlerchrysler Services North America, LLC v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Slater Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API