Legal Opinion

Fulmer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 2, 1992No. A92A1091PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Broadus Walton Fulmer was convicted of kidnapping and rape. His motion for a new trial was denied and he appeals.

1. Fulmer contends that the trial court erred in admitting testimony from a forensic serologist as to the average length of time that spermatozoa remain in the vaginal cavity after sexual intercourse because the State did not provide this information to Fulmer in response to his pre-trial request, pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-211, for discovery of the State’s written scientific reports. As the information testified to by the expert witness was not in writing, OCGA §…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MulkeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Law v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Gurlaskie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Askew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Larry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Goldsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Boynton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API