Legal Opinion

Cathcart v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 11, 1922No. 10853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Coti-iran.

The particulars of this litigation are set out in the circuit decree, which will be reported.

Except for the suggestion that the case of Cathcart v. Sugenheimer, 18 S. C. 123, is res judicata of the validity of the sale proceedings, the conclusions of the Circuit Judge are satisfactory to this Court. Argumentatively we think that the case referred to is conclusive.

It appears that in 1876 John H. Cathcart was judicially declared sane. His cause of action to set aside the various sales then arose, and the statute was not suspended by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cathcart v. MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Du RantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  2. Goolsby v. GoolsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Sheppard v. KimbroughCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  4. Anderson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API