Legal Opinion

Coxe v. Putney

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1961No. 26057PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

This is a malpractice action against a physician arising from the accidental perforation by the defendant of the plaintiff’s esophagus during'the course of an examination. During the taking of defendant’s pre-trial deposition, an issue has apparently developed whether prior to the ill-fated esophagoscopy the defendant was informed by the plaintiff’s private physician, Dr. Charamello, of previous difficulties the plaintiff had had with this type of examination and special precautions which accordingly had to be taken. Dr. Charamello swore that' he so informed the defendant.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Beirne v. Fitch Sanitarium, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rogotzki v. ScheptNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Williams v. Thomas Jefferson UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Broaddus v. Clinical Laboratory Consultants, Inc.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1978
  4. Mutek Chu Gewecke v. WolarskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API