People v. Sanchez

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of criminal possession of marihuana in the third degree (Penal Law § 221.20), defendant contends that the indictment was duplicitous because it failed to state whether *890defendant was charged as a principal or as an accomplice or whether he actually or constructively possessed the marihuana; that County Court erred in denying defendant’s motion to compel the People to specify the foregoing matters in a bill of particulars; that defendant’s statements should have been suppressed on Fourth Amendment grounds; and…