Castor v. Jones
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant claims that under the will of her deceased husband, Isaac Castor, she is entitled to an annuity of $250, and that it is a charge upon the real estate devised to Daniel Rhodes. The circuit court decided against her, and she prosecutes this appeal.
The provisions of Isaac 'Castor’s will which materially affect the case are these: “ 1st. I give and bequeath to my son-in-law, Daniel Rhodes, all of my personal property now on the farm where I reside, with the exception of one black mare and three milk cows, for to have and to hold for and in consideration hereinafter mentioned. 2d. I…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harris v. FlyNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
- Lindsey v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Morrell v. DickeyNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Jones v. RhoadsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bennett v. GaddisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heaston v. KriegIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Porter v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Davidson v. CoonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Chas. J. Smith Co. v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1915
- Commons v. CommonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.