Legal Opinion

Meigs v. Lear

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 16, 1968No. J-185PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAWLS, Acting Chief Judge.

The executrix appeals from a final summary judgment in favor of plaintiff, and contends that same should have not been entered upon the record before the trial judge. We agree and reverse.

Lear sued the estate upon a promissory note allegedly executed by C. G. Meigs and Thomas Powell on November 9, 1946, in the sum of $5,000.00, payable sixty days from date, bearing interest at 8% per annum, and providing for payment of reasonable attorney’s fees if placed in the hands of an attorney for collection. The trial judge entered summary judgment in the sum of $5,000.00…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Humphrys v. JarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  2. Touart v. GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Wilson v. State Road Department of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. National Properties, Inc. v. Ballenger Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Champion Map Corp. v. Chamco, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  4. Rice v. Mercy Hospital CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Scott v. GordonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API