Legal Opinion

Candler v. Neal & Son Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 21, 1933No. 8937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.

Where a county order is presented to the treasurer or the keeper of the county funds, for payment, and he indorses upon it the fact and date of presentation, with the statement signed by him that he has not sufficient funds on hand with which to pay it, the indorsement being as follows: “Presented for payment August 10, 1925, insf. funds,” such indorsement is a substantial compliance with the provision of the Civil Code (1910), § 582, as amended by an act approved July 24, 1920 (Ga. L. 1920, p. 65; Park’s Code Supp. and Michie’s Code, § 582), which provides that the official to whom a county…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Candler v. Neal & Son Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  2. Neal & Son Inc. v. CandlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API