Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Carson/Kent Joint Venture v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 3, 1995Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partFriedman, Judge
I concur in part and dissent in part. I agree with the Majority that Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Miller), 70 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 6, 452 A.2d 286 (1982), controls the present result and, like the Majority, would affirm the order of the Board dismissing the Termination Petition filed by Carson/Kent Joint Venture. However, I would grant Claimant’s request for counsel fees.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bechtel Power Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982