Legal Opinion
Pri-Har v. United States
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 6, 2002No. 96 CIV. 9577(JES), 93 CR. 278(JES)Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SPRIZZO, District Judge.
Petitioner seeks to vacate the judgment against him in Pri-har v. United States, 83 F.Supp.2d 393 (S.D.N.Y.2000) pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 60(b)(3) relying in large part on alleged fraud conducted by the Government during the prosecution of that habeas corpus proceeding. Petitioner claims that the Assistant United States Attorney made fraudulent representations in order to procure judgment in the Government’s favor. For the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s motion is hereby denied.
BACKGROUND
Petitioner is currently serving a 168-month…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Robert Rodriguez v. Robert Mitchell, Superintendent, Eastern Correctional Facility, and Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Eldon L. Page v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Janeen O. Lonsdorf v. Ted Seefeldt, Jim Jenkins, Roger Johnson, Jerry Pionkowski, Jack Deyong, Group Health Cooperative, HmoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Barry Jay Feldman v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.