Legal Opinion

Pryor v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 1, 1984No. Appeal, No. 1546 C.D. 1982Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

Nancy S. Pryor (claimant) appeals from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirms the order of a referee denying compensation benefits to claimant. We affirm.

Claimant, employed by respondent, Bell Telephone, of Pennsylvania (Bell), as a long-,distance operator supervisor from 11:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m., shortly before the conclusion of her shift on May 15, 1980, was asked to come into a conference room and was interrogated by security investigators involving the fraudulent use of a discontinued credit card issued by Bell to another…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Williamsport v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bowes v. Inter-Community Action, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hepp v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board & Guida v. Precisionware, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. GuzmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API