Legal Opinion

Anthis v. Wheeler

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 1928No. 18810PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, V. C. J.

The defendants in error were plaintiffs and the plaintiffs in error wer'e defendants in the trial court, and will be so referred to herein.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against the defendants to recover $200 'in consideration of the drilling of a test well for oil and gas to the Wilcox sand at a location designated in and under the terms and conditions of a written contract in the form of a letter from the defendants to the plaintiffs, the material parts of which are as follows:

“For the consideration of your drilling a well to the Wilcox sand (unless oil or gas in paying…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deming Investment Co. v. Shawnee Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Stebbins v. Lena Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Hardin v. KirbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rose v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Cridland v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. J.E. Devine v. Ladd Petroleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API