Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ohler v. Ohler

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1985No. 84-180Published

1DissentKrivosha, C. J.

I regret that I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion in this case. I believe that by declaring, as a matter of law, that incarceration resulting in the reduction or elimination of income or assets does not constitute such a material change of circumstances as to warrant the temporary termination of a child support obligation, the court has created many more problems than those which it believes it has solved. Unlike the majority, I am persuaded by the reasoning of the Court of Appeals for the State of Oregon in the case of Edmonds and Edmonds, 53 Or. App. 539, 633 P.2d 4…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Matter of Marriage of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Cooper v. CooperNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Tice v. TiceOregon Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API