Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kyles v. Kyles

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 29, 2016No. 2140449Published

1DissentThompson, Presiding Judge

It is axiomatic that an award of periodic alimony and the division of marital property are interrelated and that an appellate court must consider the two together when reviewing the decision of the trial court. Kreitzberg v. Kreitzberg, 131 So.3d 612, 620 (Ala.Civ.App.2013); McClellan v. McClellan, 959 So.2d 658, 660 (Ala.Civ. App.2006). In considering the trial court’s award of periodic alimony and the division of marital property in this case, I agree with Patricia Kyles (“the wife”) that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding her periodic alimony of only $250 a month.

The parties…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Stone v. StoneCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  3. Ex Parte VaughnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Kreitzberg v. KreitzbergCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013
  5. McClellan v. McClellanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API