Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 22, 1990No. Nos. 89-15671, 89-15696 and 89-16270PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TANG, Circuit Judge:
OVERVIEW
Kenneth Andrew Friedman (“Friedman”) and Arnold Naftel (“Naftel”) appeal the district court’s decision to uphold the Arizona Department of Corrections’ (“ADOC”) Internal Management Policy No. 304.7 (“IMP 304.7”) which prohibits facial hair. Friedman and Naftel assert that this regulation impermissibly infringes upon their First Amendment right to exercise their religion freely. Friedman also appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for attorney fees for services he rendered as a paralegal. We affirm both of the district court’s decisions.
FACTS AND…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'Lone v. Estate of ShabazzSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Wyatt v. TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- May v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- C.D. Mosier v. Gary Maynard, D.O.C. Dan Reynolds, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.