Conkey v. Hoak Motors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal from dismissal of plaintiffs small claims action for conversion. Two matters are at issue: (1) the authority of defense counsel to appear pro hac vice and, (2) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the district court judgment. Finding no error warranting reversal, we affirm.
The facts are essentially undisputed. Plaintiff, Frank Conkey, leased a van from defendant, Hoak Motors, Inc., who assigned the lease to defendant, GMAC. Conkey fell behind on his lease payments. Efforts by GMAC to persuade Conkey to cure the arrearage were unsuccessful. So when…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hawkeye Bank & Trust, National Ass'n v. BaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
- Lombardi v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- State v. GlantonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Hyde v. AnaniaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- GE Money Bank v. MoralesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Wilson v. Vanden BergSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- GE Money Bank Vs. Maria MoralesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Michael Thomas Goodwin v. Iowa District Court for Davis CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Robert Clauss v. Laidlaw & Company UK Ltd.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.