Legal Opinion

Trammel v. United States

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided October 15, 2024No. 4:13-cv-00813Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION EDWARD TRAMMEL, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 4:13CV813 HEA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Petitioner filed a motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On August 8, 2016, this court denied Petitioner’s Motion. Petitioner now moves relief from the judgment under Rule 60(b). [Doc. No. 40] Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) provides that “[o]n motion and just terms, the court may relieve a party ... from a final judgment” for the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jones v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Sharon Richards v. Aramark Services, Inc., F/k/a Ara Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Matthew McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  4. United States v. Matthew McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API