Legal Opinion

Tousley v. Howe

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 3, 1962No. 38,573PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Plaintiff, Frank Tousley, was injured while hunting when a shotgun which defendant, Edwin Howe, a minor, was allegedly holding or manipulating accidentally discharged. Plaintiff commenced suit against defendant by service of a summons and complaint on March 2, 1961. Thereafter, Edwin Howe, Sr., was appointed guardian ad litem upon application of the plaintiff. His oath and consent was filed May 19, 1961, from which time defendant was given an additional 20 days in which to answer. Defendant’s attorney mailed an answer to plaintiff on July 18, 1961, but not until after…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Baxter v. ChuteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Exley v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  5. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. v. Morbern Industries Ltd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. Simon Property GRroup, L.P v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API