Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of T.M.M.H. – Per Curiam

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 2018No. 115309Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,309 In the Matter of the Adoption of T.M.M.H. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The Kansas Constitution imposes a case-or-controversy requirement. Part of that requirement, and a component of subject matter jurisdiction, is standing. Standing concerns a litigant's ability to seek a judicial remedy or to seek judicial enforcement of a right or duty. 2. If a statute provides the basis for asserting a right to seek a judicial remedy, a multilevel analysis applies to the determination of standing: First, courts analyze standing as a matter of statute…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API